Archive for January 10th, 2008

The princess and the Gentile

An opportunity to rib one of my colleagues about a misspelling in a recent email.  Trying to indicate a street near our office as our meeting point in case of fire, he alerted everyone to meet at ‘Gentile’s Entry’. (Edinburgh residents can work out the original version.)

For a cultural organisation, you could argue this was a problematic choice: where are our Jewish, and any other faith, visitors meant to go?  But I had the opportunity to hear a more regular mis-pronunciation the same day, heading up the close that leads up to the Royal Mile.  A tourist stopped me and asked for ‘Princess Street’. 

‘Princes’ is not used in so many place names, I’ll grant you, which I think is why ‘Princess’ seems to be said by various visitors to Edinburgh.  It made me think that there are probably not so many mispronunciations that give you another word instead of your original choice.

Dan and another friend who grew up in London used to come up with alternative pronuncations for London areas.  ‘Streatham’ became ‘St Reathams’, and so on.  Dan equally was very pleased a few years back to hear me saying ‘An-tig-u-a’ for another Edinburgh street name, rather than ‘An-teeg-wa’.  I had to make the joke against myself for a long time to stop that one being repeated back at me.

My brother came up with two of my favourite mishearings of place names.  When a school friend got into an Oxford college (Somerville), he managed to understand that she had got a job at the then local supermarket (Somerfields).  Equally, when I got the news of where I was going to be during my gap year teaching (Warsaw), he thought I would be just up the road, so to speak (Walsall).

New housing estates breed rather odd names (Edinburgh will currently offer you Q, The Visio, along with the lovely East Pilton Farm Rigg - try saying that to your taxi driver after a hard night out).  I can’t help but think they’re missing out on some great mispronunciations to come.

Add comment January 10th, 2008

Immediate feedback

Blog writing is a dangerous thing.  Yesterday I learned that one friend reads this blog ‘most days’; another met me at a group yesterday and mentioned she’d read the Robin Hood post from the day before.  That’s immediate feedback for you!

Of course, they could have also posted a comment, and then I’d have known about them reading it.  But there again, am I posting comments on others’ stuff?  I read most of one friend’s film blog posts, but tend not to comment - don’t correct a man with superior film knowledge, eh?  Or something.

All of which could mean there are others reading it, that I have no idea about.  I don’t know if there’s some way of telling who’s read it, whether or not they leave a message.  At least a few people I know who’ve mentioned something, I don’t even remember telling about the blog…

Anyway, can’t help but feel that it’s gratifying for people a) to have bothered reading it and b) to have said something after, one way or another.  It makes me inclined to keep going, at least.  This is bad news for the casual reader, who hoped for something light and frothy about the next series of Big Brother.  For everyone else…maybe I’ll have to up my bus usage so I have enough to write about.  You have been warned.

Add comment January 10th, 2008


Calendar

January 2008
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category